<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proposition 8 and Connecticut</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prayct.org/2008/11/05/proposition-8-and-connecticut/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prayct.org/2008/11/05/proposition-8-and-connecticut/</link>
	<description>Promoting prayer and revival in The Constitution State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:37:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.prayct.org/2008/11/05/proposition-8-and-connecticut/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prayct.org/?p=430#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment but you are proving the point of people in Connecticut who wanted a Constitutional Convention.  We have no way of knowing what the majority in Connecticut would want - and the Supreme Court of our State seems content to deprive them of any voice in the matter.

Surely you know that the people do not wish homosexual marriage to be viewed as normal.  Even citizens of California voted against this when they had the opportunity to exercise their will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment but you are proving the point of people in Connecticut who wanted a Constitutional Convention.  We have no way of knowing what the majority in Connecticut would want &#8211; and the Supreme Court of our State seems content to deprive them of any voice in the matter.</p>
<p>Surely you know that the people do not wish homosexual marriage to be viewed as normal.  Even citizens of California voted against this when they had the opportunity to exercise their will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wmrourke</title>
		<link>http://www.prayct.org/2008/11/05/proposition-8-and-connecticut/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>wmrourke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prayct.org/?p=430#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the majority in CT does not want to have the will of YOUR robed masters imposed on us.  The Judicial Branch is concerned with things civil, answerable for the good of ALL.  Your robed masters belong in their churches, answerable to their congregations and as such are not concerned with the good of all, only their own narrow constituencies.  

Thank GOD the people of CT voted to put the good of all above the wants of the few special interests you represent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the majority in CT does not want to have the will of YOUR robed masters imposed on us.  The Judicial Branch is concerned with things civil, answerable for the good of ALL.  Your robed masters belong in their churches, answerable to their congregations and as such are not concerned with the good of all, only their own narrow constituencies.  </p>
<p>Thank GOD the people of CT voted to put the good of all above the wants of the few special interests you represent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

